Skip to content

Aerosoft – EDDN Nuernberg Airport v1.1.0
MSFS 2020/2024

Addon Screenshot
Works with MSFS 2024: Yes – Compatible
Works with MSFS 2020: Yes – Native
Info

Note: This airport conflicts with Freds Airports EDDN airport, only use one of the two.
This add-on brings Bavaria’s second largest international airport in an incomparably authentic and lively atmosphere to MS Flight Simulator.

Three very well-known developers with years of experience have bundled their expertise to make this a state-of-the-art product: Captain7, 29Palms and LimeSim.

A special highlight of the scenery is the innumerable vehicle and person animations, which contrib … read moreutes significantly to the realistic atmosphere at the airport. A lot of work was also put into the true to life depiction of the taxiway and apron surfaces.

Features:

• Highly realistic rendition of Nuremberg Airport based on most recent data
• Highly detailed buildings with internal modelling of the terminal and Hangar 2
• Sloped runway and taxiways based on real world data
• Accurate taxiway, apron and stands layout
• Includes the newly build P4 car park
• Custom aerial image covering the airport area
• Custom taxiway signage
• Realistic materials (depiction of reflective/non reflective materials, bump maps…)
• Realistic night time dynamic lighting
• Using the new MSFS airport lighting system for taxiways with custom made models for this airport

• Smart features like:
• Animated jetways
• Moving custom ground traffic with proper animations, lighting and sounds
• Animated characters
• Upgraded service definition file (e.g., stairways available at gates that don’t have jetway)
• Open / Close FAI gate

• Static aircraft with proper liveries and registrations
New comments disabled. Please follow our Help page on any problems or contact us for any suggestions.

19 thoughts on “Aerosoft – EDDN Nuernberg Airport v1.1.0
MSFS 2020/2024

  1. For some reason, they recommend the scenario from aerosoft, but I liked the airport scenario from Freds. 

      1. Outwardly, Aerosoft did not like it.
        Buildings are worse, textures are also worse.
        There are more animations of transport and people, there are more cars in the parking lots, and the work inside the terminals is also better, but visually aerosoft is worse.
        Every minute a siren sounds and a fire truck passes – the sound even drowns out the noise of the airport and taking off planes.
        The runway from the side of 10 with some kind of patches, not a high-quality script.
        Aerosoft is 80 megabytes smaller in size, I didn’t compare it by FPS, because. computer is powerful.
        For me, it’s just an advertisement for Aerosoft, and nothing more.
        Their scenario is worse.IMHO.

        1. MS airports not asobo

          A petty fallacy is that the WU8 airports are by asobo studio, i know it’s generally used to refer to as handcrafted airports. here all four new airports are microsoft airports designed by Gaya. Additionally I profoundly think all four airports might well be preferred over their corresponding third party renders. Gaya did an amazing job again.

            1. That’s correct. Ever since Asobo commissioned Gaya, thier handcrafted airports are preferable over many 3rd party, unless we talking stuff like Flytampa, Pyreegue etc then it’s a different story.

      Comments are closed.