Skip to content

FeelThere – KLAX Los Angeles International Airport v1.4.0
MSFS 2020

Addon Screenshot
Works with MSFS 2024: Unknown
Works with MSFS 2020: Yes – Native
Info

Note: This airport conflicts with Asobo Studio KLAX and iniBuilds KLAX airport, only use one of the three.
FeelThere is bringing you as the fifth release for MSFS2020, the primary international airport serving the always busy Los Angeles with four parallel runways.

As the largest and busiest international airport on the U.S. West Coast, LAX is a major international gateway to the United States, and also serves a connection point for passengers travelling internationally. The airport holds the record f … read moreor the world’s busiest origin and destination airport, since relative to other airports, many more travellers begin or end their trips in Los Angeles than use it as a connection. It is also the only airport to rank among the top five U.S. airports for both passenger and cargo traffic.

Runways:

24R/06L and 24L/06R are north of the airport terminals, and 25R/07L and 25L/07R are south of the airport terminals.LAX has 132 gates arranged in the shape of the letter U with 9 passenger terminals.

Features:

• Custom ground linesand buildings
• Highly detailed, Physically Based Rendering (PBR), reflective and realistic textures
• Parallax texturing on windowsInstallation
New comments disabled. Please follow our Help page on any problems or contact us for any suggestions.

39 thoughts on “FeelThere – KLAX Los Angeles International Airport v1.4.0
MSFS 2020

  1. FeelThere – KLAX Los Angeles International Airport (MSFS) Changelog
    Latest Update: 2022/11/22

    v1.4.0

    – Excluded road traffic from the airport boundary

    – Fixed approach lighting spacing

    – Added tdz lighting to 25L,24R,7L,6R

    v1.3.0 – 2022/08/01

    – Fixed terraforming and elevation issues related to the recent USA update.

  2. I cannot get this thing to work. I disabled asobo’s klax from content manager. I even tried removing every other addon but this. I still see messed up klax default scenery. Is there anything else I need to do other than drag drop the extracted folder into community directory? I am using update 11 beta.

  3. I think that it has improved in visuals with the last update. It also added some of the gates that were missing in Bradley terminal.

  4. Warning: This airport conflicts with Asobo Studio KLAX airport, only use one of the two (Asobo recommended).

    1. Agreed! Asobo is much better visually + FPS friendly vs FeelThere.

      Also agree with your name!

  5. Needs to add 3 gates at the Bradley Intl terminal. Also needs a huge LOD improvemet, since it’s a massive fps killer addon.

  6. Anything from FeelThere is complete shit, I have to say. It is NOT an improvement, and one large blurry parallax copy-pasted on every terminal as windows just shows how bad it can be. The modelling, if not using the Asobo KLAX, has little improvement, taxi lines and ground textures are still little comfort, being Asobo painted lines with a different colour and maybe some numbers on them that doesn’t reflect RL. Sorry, but anyone who thinks this is an improvement, open your eyes.

    1. I think LAX had already got the treatment it deserves with both the default asobo and this version, there are both cool overall. Might be irrelevant, but it’s LFPG and EDDF that needs a high quality new version as the default asobo versions are the worst of the handcrafted airports in the entire msfs.

    2. there airports are bad but there recent planes are actually verygood in system like pmdg and visually, tho there old aircraft are good in system but extremely bad graphics. No wonder their airport are bad because its the first time they started doing them

  7. Checkout the MSFS user reviews of those who actually purchased it to get an idea.

    ”Bought it – regret it.
    Low-res textures everywhere.
    Buildings look like they were done 20 years ago.
    Not an improvement to the existing Asobo version.
    Compared to other payware airports like EDDN from Fred’s Airports in the same price range, this is a cash grab.”

    1. Agreed. Based on my experience, it’s more immersive and enjoyable to taxi-in than the default and that’s enough for me to keep it.

  8. When the developer doesn’t include any view inside the terminals, then it’s a sure gauge of how much details are to be expected. Even the Features list is just this:

    FeaturesIncludes:
    – Custom ground lines and buildings
    – Highly detailed textures, Physically Based Rendering (PBR), reflective and realistic textures
    – Parallax texturing on windows

    Thank you anyways SimPlaza.

    1. Do you think that what matters in a flightsim scenery are the interiors? This is not a drone simulator, its flightsim…Shit happens outside the terminal….

      1. Read carefully what is said .. or better yet attend a proper English class. Obviously your grasp of the language is questionable.

        1. When the developer doesn’t include any view inside the terminals”

          Why even bother including this then? If you’re trying to make an argument about the amount of details that are expected, what difference does it make about what’s inside the terminals?

    1. Exactly! It’s another offering for cash grab to reel-in the unsuspecting. Pay-ware isn’t always better than FreeWare.

Comments are closed.