Skip to content

MK–STUDIOS – LEBL Barcelona Airport v1.3.0
MSFS 2020/2024

Addon Screenshot
Works with MSFS 2024: Yes – Backwards Compatible
Works with MSFS 2020: Yes – Native
Info

Note: This airport conflicts with JustSim LEBL, LatinVFR LEBL and Sim Wings LEBL airport, only use one of the four.

Note: To use VDGS (Visual Docking Guidance System), follow the instructions on vdgs.nool.ee.
Welcome to Barcelona-El Prat (LEBL), the heart of Catalonia!

Located 12 kilometers southwest of Barcelona, it’s Spain’s second busiest airport. It is a crucial gateway to the Catalonia region, offering connections across Europe and international destinations. The airport features two main terminals, T1 and T2, designed to efficiently manage millions of passengers annually. Terminal 1 is noted for … read more its modern architecture and range of services, including shopping and dining, while Terminal 2 caters to domestic and low-cost flights.

Features:

• Lifelike recreation of Barcelona Airport LEBL, including detailed terminal interior
• Working Nool VDGS devices, including A-CDM
• Handcrafted 3D models of buildings, jetways, and airport facilities
• Custom, 30cm/pixel satellite image covering the airport
• Elevation data based on high-quality LiDAR scans, including runway and apron profiles
• Custom, up-to-date ground polygons with lines, dirt, markings, and other details
• Realistic lighting for immersive day and night operations
• Custom POIs around the airport
• AI compatible
• AI parking codes
Torrenting Guide
New comments disabled. Please follow our Help page on any problems or contact us for any suggestions.

34 thoughts on “MK–STUDIOS – LEBL Barcelona Airport v1.3.0
MSFS 2020/2024

  1. I did a fps test between SimWings and mk-studios and here are the results, tested with PMDG 777, same conditions, gate 288, facing runway 24R which gets a major fps hit in simwings version, preset HIGH, DX11:

    SimWings: 25-27 fps;
    MK-Studios: 47-50 fps.

    Specs: i7 8700, RTX 2070.

  2. Hellfire Minute Man

    Is it possible to remove the harbor edits they’ve made? I like the ones in CU-XII better.

    1. Changelog version 1.3.0:
      • City Update 7 compatibility
      • Terminal 2 fixes and optimization
      • Jetway docking position fixed
      • General fixes

  3. needs an update after the latest CU 7 that also covers the airport in order to solve the flat imagery instead of TIN buildings

  4. Barcelona 1.2.0
    – GSX profile ready,
    – Air Conditioners bug removed,
    – Custom taxiway/runway exit lights added
    – Default stairs removed,
    – GSE placement fixes.

  5. Did you saw air conditioner hovering at 06L ??? I remove airport and check default, all ok. So it’s this scenery. Did anyone notice that?

  6. ‘Terminal Optimization’ – V1.1.1 update definitely fixed my performance issues with this scenery when looking towards the main terminal. Went from 22 to 40fps. Nice job MK.

  7. wouldn´t you like to know

    All in all a nice scenery and I´d say MKs and LVFRs Barcelona are on the same level.
    BUT: although it says so in the changelog, the VDGS is still hovering in the air a few meters next to the original position with V1.1.0… I don´t know what they fixed, but this is still crappy

  8. From someone living in BCN I still think the LVFR version is the best one, especially if coupled with a freeware to complete the port area available in fs.to
    Tested this one this morning and compared to LVFR.
    First of all, AI (FSLTL) is all over the place, completely.
    Vueling flights in Terminal 2, some Easy and Ryan parked in T1, cargo airplanes connected to the gates in T1, really not expected and ruins completely immersion. With LVFR AI is almost completely in the correct gates with minor exceptions, notably Swift Air.
    Plaza Europa, well visible on finals, is missing as well here, same for Tibidabo.
    I am not interested in airport interiors so I will skip that part.
    Latest isn’t always greatest and the latest frenzy for LEBL didn’t produce anything better than what we had.
    Anyway, having options is a good thing.

    1. Hi! I’m from Barcelona. You can use it with port area from fs.to too, but I completely agree with you, there are also other comments, for example, the runway 24 sign is indicated as 25. I think that lvfr version better at the moment.

      1. right! I forgot about the glaring mistake with the runways.
        seems the devs focus here went in a very wrong direction.
        why would care about wrong runways when you have terminal interiors 😀
        (magnetic orientation changed in 2022 if I remember correctly)

    2. I also tested the new ones and decided to keep LatinVFR one, in terms of frames is also better. The green color all over the terminal looks better too. It has something in its whole built that gives you a better sensation all over the place. I kept LatinVFR

    3. this one is by far the best, almost top-notch until some dev like ft or fb ever gets their hands on, which will never happen.

Comments are closed.